By Aburk018 at English Wikibooks [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
The Forward-Looking Assignment
Today, I received an email from a professor who stated that 6 out of 9 students in his graduate research methods class used articles that were NOT peer reviewed. To mitigate this from happening after students take my Freshman Foundations course, I will have students consider this assignment.
Posing the Question
One of the course learning objectives is "Ask relevant questions about the origins, context, and authority of information while challenging the everyday acceptance of information quality." To bring in a real-world application, I will ask students to consider who and what defines authority in their field of choice. Questions that students will need to consider are:
- How do I know that my source is credible?
- Does if make a difference where I find the source?
- What defines authority in my field?
- What steps should I take to make sure that I have a quality source?
Students will need to develop a set of field-specific criteria.
Criteria and Standards
Criteria
|
Exceeds Standards
|
Meets Standards
|
Beginner
|
Search Strategy
|
Student used library databases to locate peer-reviewed articles and
added additional limiters, such as subject searching, date, or publication
|
Student used library databases, but may not have used any limiters
|
Student performed basic Google searching
|
Evaluation
|
Student went beyond relying on limiters and used Ullrich’s Periodicals
Directory to verify peer-review status of publication or performed additional
searches to discover author’s credentials and/or publication history
|
Student relied on the fact that articles were included in the library
databases as a means of establishing credibility
|
Student did not evaluate retrieved sources
|
No comments:
Post a Comment